When Kelly dropped this song in 2004, there were ~50 local, state, and federal leave laws in the United States, total.

Today, there are more than 600.

While Kelly Clarkson made “Since U Been Gone” sound like a great strategy, it is not always the best approach when an employee is on leave. Before adopting an “out of sight, out of mind” mindset, give this quarter’s newsletter a skim. There may be a leave law amendment that changes the situation entirely.

FEDERAL UPDATES

2026_10_TAM_Q4_Newsletter_Federal Updates

Shorter EEOC Response Times

Employers responding to charges filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may soon face significantly shorter deadlines, according to reports of an upcoming nationwide procedural change. The agency has not yet publicly released the policy, but the expected changes could dramatically affect how employers and counsel respond to EEOC investigations. So that is like……an adjustment.

Currently, employers generally have 30 days to submit a position statement. Additionally, EEOC offices have often granted additional time when warranted and an employer has been working in good faith to respond as soon as possible.

It is being reported that the EEOC is soon expected to reduce the standard response period from 30 days to 15 days and adopt a much more restrictive approach to extension requests. If implemented, employers could have considerably less time to gather facts, review documents, interview witnesses, and prepare a comprehensive response.

Cases involving multiple employees, extensive personnel records, involvement with a TPA, disability or leave accommodation issues, or broader workplace practices often require substantial investigation before a meaningful response can be prepared which makes the process more challenging.

Did our first article give you a ‘jump scare’ as the kids say? Me too. In light of these expected changes, employers may want to review their internal processes for handling EEOC charges and make sure those personnel file cabinet keys aren’t missing.

Note, because the EEOC’s policy has not yet been formally released, details could change before implementation. Nevertheless, individuals that regularly respond to EEOC charges should keep an eye on these developments.

CASE LAW

2026_10_TAM_Q4_Newsletter_caseLaw

The Second Opinion Process for the Win

The second (and third) opinion process is one of the few employer friendly provisions under FMLA that we occasionally advise our clients to pursue. This case is an example of where the extra steps created a win for the employer.

Russ took intermittent medical leave on 24 different occasions without following the employer’s call-in procedure, and then provided medical certification from a local chiropractor who is known to churn out FMLA medical certifications.

The employer’s third-party leave administrator (TPA) recognized this chiropractor had a reputation for issuing FMLA medical certifications with unusual frequency and for making recommendations beyond the scope of their expertise. Credit to the TPA for identifying the concern and taking a closer look!

This raised enough concern to trigger a second opinion, as there was objective reason to doubt the certification. For those of you needing a refresher, employers are allowed to pursue a second opinion if there is reason to doubt the validity of the complete and sufficient medical certification. The employer chooses the healthcare provider for the second opinion, then if the second opinion is different from the original cert, the employer may require the employee to get a third certification from a provider selected by both the employee and employer. Spoiler alert: a third opinion is often necessary, as the second opinion rarely aligns with the original certification. As a result, employers should be prepared for a determination process that can take several months.

Anyways, I digress, back to Russ.

The second-opinion physician, an orthopedist, looked at the same circumstances and reached the exact opposite conclusion: there is no qualifying need for leave. Plot twist!

One provider says “yes.” One provider says “no.”

Now, onto the third opinion, which is designed to be the tiebreaker. The third opinion becomes final and binding. 29 C.F.R. § 825.307(c)

The TPA sent a letter to Russ explaining the next step, the third opinion. Russ, said, ‘no thanks, I’ll pass.’ Note, that’s not really what Russ said, I’ve embellished to tell a better story.

Russ never responded nor did he cooperate in scheduling the third opinion. FMLA requires both employees and employers to act in good faith during the third-opinion process. When an employee refuses to participate in that process, the regulations bind the employee to the second opinion. And in this case, the second opinion said no FMLA leave.

Don’t worry, my storytelling isn’t over yet! Despite never completing the third-opinion process and the TPA denying his FMLA leave, Russ continued calling off work and coding his absences as FMLA leave. However, his employer required employees not only to report the absence to the location at which they worked (Step 1), but also to report the absence to the TPA (Step 2). Russ was repeatedly not reporting his absences to the TPA.

Eventually, someone noticed the records weren’t matching up and the employer terminated Russ.

As the story goes, Russ filed FMLA interference and retaliation claims. His FMLA claims were subsequently dismissed.

The FMLA regulations make clear that, “if the employee does not attempt in good faith to reach agreement [on a third health care provider, and does not cooperate in the process], the employee will be bound by the second certification.”

This case has two important takeaways for employers. First, the second- and third-opinion process is underutilized, but for good reason, as the process can be costly, and employers often are left disillusioned when an independent physician declines to second-guess the opinions of the employee’s physician. But when an employer legitimately questions a certification and follows the regulatory framework, this process may be worth it.

Second, enforce those call-in requirements! This employer, like many of you, have dual reporting requirements to notify both work location and the third-party leave administrator. Calling one without the other isn’t enough. Courts across the country regularly recognize that employers may require employees to follow reasonable call-in and absence-reporting procedures, even when the absence may be FMLA-qualifying. The FMLA does not allow employees to dodge an employer’s established attendance procedures. One of the most effective leave-management tools available to employers is a two-call requirement: one call to the employee’s supervisor, manager or attendance line, and a second call to the employer’s leave administrator responsible for tracking FMLA leave. Such a system ensures that operational managers know the employee will be absent while also allowing the individuals actually administering FMLA leave to accurately track, designate, and manage the absence. Make sure these requirements are well documented and regularly communicated to your employees (ensure policies are clear and leave communications include reminders).

STATE UPDATES

CALIFORNIA

The Golden State Adds a Little More Shine

Just when you thought you had California leave laws mapped out, the Golden State decided there was room for a few more updates. Governor Gavin Newsom signed three bills at the tail end of September, making changes to California’s State Disability Insurance (SDI) and Paid Family Leave (PFL) programs.

AB 2054: Paid Family Leave (PFL) Gets a Broader Military Exigency Definition

California PFL already provides benefits for employees taking time away from work for certain qualifying military exigencies involving a spouse, domestic partner, child, or parent. AB 2054 expands what counts as “covered active duty.”

The new law removes the requirement that deployment be to a foreign country and expands the definition to more clearly encompass stateside missions, extended training, and activation involving members of the National Guard and Reserve. In other words, California PFL is getting new marching orders, and more military families may qualify for benefits when duty calls.

This amendment will become operative on July 1, 2028, or when paid family leave is incorporated in the California Employment Development Department’s integrated claims management system as part of the EDDNext project, whichever date is earlier.

AB 2292: Putting the “Free” Back in Leave Paperwork

Anyone who administers leave knows that medical certification paperwork can come with challenges. AB 2292 aims to make sure an extra bill isn’t one of them.

Effective January 1, 2027, this legislation prohibits physicians and practitioners from charging a claimant a fee for completing the medical certification necessary to support a California disability of paid family leave benefit claim. The change is intended to remove another potential barrier between employees and access to paid family and medical leave benefits.

The amended law does not prevent or restrict providers from billing for medical services provided in connection with an examination, however, or from collecting any copayment, coinsurance, or deductible, if those charges are consistent with charges for a comparable medical examination or service and are not imposed solely to complete a certificate or form.

Although AB 2292’s amendments will not directly impact employers, they could indirectly affect administration of leaves and disability accommodation requests by removing a financial obstacle employees might face when attempting to obtain medical certification (as the governor put it in a press release, “eliminating junk fees for completing medical documents.”).

California Keeps the “Family” Expanding: Bereavement Leave Adds a Designated Person

Governor Newsom signed SB 1149 on September 27, 2026, expanding California’s bereavement leave to recognize a “designated person” as a covered family member beginning January 1, 2027. Under current California law, employers with five or more employees must provide eligible employees with up to five days of bereavement leave following the death of a covered family member. SB 1149 does not increase those five days but it does expand who counts as family.

Beginning January 1, a covered family member will also include a designated person, defined as an individual who is related to the employee by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship. Employees may identify their designated person when requesting bereavement leave, and employers may limit employees to one designated person per 12-month period for purposes of bereavement leave.

A familiar California theme: SB 1149 continues California’s movement away from a strictly traditional definition of “family.” Designated-person concepts already appear in other California leave protections, including CFRA and Paid Sick Leave, making it increasingly important for employers to look beyond the traditional spouse-parent-child family tree when administering leave.

What should employers do? Before January 1, 2027, California employers should review their bereavement policies, handbooks, leave forms, and administrative procedures to ensure the definition of family member includes a designated person. Employers should also consider how they will document an employee’s designation and consistently apply the one-designated-person-per-12-month-period limitation if they choose to use it.

The takeaway: California’s family tree keeps growing—and this time, bereavement leave is adding another branch.

California may be famous for sunshine and when it comes to leave compliance, there is rarely a dull moment.

Bridging the Gap: San Francisco’s Paid Parental Leave Ordinance Expansion

If California’s leave laws already feel like a winding road, San Francisco adds another hill to climb. Alongside the state’s leave protections and paid benefits, employers must navigate local ordinances including the San Francisco Paid Parental Leave Ordinance (SF PPLO).

Think of SF PPLO as a bridge between partial wage replacement and an employee’s regular paycheck. It requires covered employers to provide supplemental compensation to eligible employees receiving California Paid Family Leave (CA PFL) benefits to bond with a new child during the first year following birth, adoption, or foster placement.

Before we cross that bridge, let’s check who qualifies. SF PPLO generally covers employers with 20 or more employees worldwide. Employers with 19 or fewer employees remain exempt, including under the upcoming amendments. Currently, an employee must:

  • Have been employed by the covered employer for at least 180 days before the leave begins.
  • Perform at least eight hours of work per week in San Francisco for that employer.
  • Perform at least 40% of their total weekly work hours for that employer in San Francisco.
  • Be eligible to receive CA PFL benefits for bonding with a new child.

For qualifying employees, covered employers must provide up to eight weeks of supplemental compensation, filling the gap between CA PFL benefits and the employee’s normal gross weekly wages, subject to the ordinance’s cap. For 2026, the maximum combined weekly amount is $2,522. That is the ceiling for CA PFL plus the employer supplement, not the flat payment every employee receives. The cap is adjusted annually.

Now for the upcoming turn on the road. San Francisco amended the ordinance to cut the employment requirement from 180 days to 90 days, with implementation phased by employer size.

Effective Date Employer Size (counted globally) Employment Requirement
January 1, 2027 100 or more employees Reduced to 90 days
January 1, 2028 20-99 employees Reduced to 90 days

*Employers with 20–99 employees retain the 180-day requirement through 2027. The other employee eligibility requirements continue to apply.

With the new year approaching, employers should review their policies, eligibility procedures, and payroll coordination, and monitor the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement (OLSE) for updated guidance and materials. Leverage your TPG TAM team to support a potential assessment of your policies.

Need help with the numbers? The SF PPLO calculator can help determine the required supplemental compensation. Use the appropriate year calculator and instructions: calculations vary depending on whether the employee has multiple jobs or receives tips.

A little preparation now can keep your parental leave administration from getting lost in the fog.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Universal Paid Leave Amendments

The District of Columbia’s Universal Paid Leave Act has been amended. Effective 10/1/2026, in an unusual move by a paid leave program, the program’s employee benefit entitlement and weekly maximum benefit was reduced.

Prior to 10/1/2026, the program offered employees up to 12 weeks of leave per year with 2 extra weeks for prenatal care. Below is the amount of leave an employee could take per leave reason (prior to 10/1/26):

  • 12 weeks for parental leave
  • 12 weeks for family leave
  • 12 weeks for medical leave
  • 2 extra weeks for prenatal leave

After 10/1/2026 (in other words, right now), employees will still be entitled up to 12 weeks of combined leave per year, however, the amount of entitlement granted per leave reason is decreasing. See the new leave allotments for each leave reason:

  • 12 weeks for parental leave
  • 6 weeks for family leave
  • 10 weeks for medical leave
  • 2 extra weeks for prenatal leave

The amendments are temporarily in effect from 10/1/2026 to 9/30/2030, after which the previous leave entitlement amounts will be restored. For those sad about this: don’t worry, 4 years isn’t that long. Think about it as being one whole college undergrad experience, or an entire presidential term, or when you get to watch the Olympics or FIFA World Cup again.

Wow, I guess that is a pretty long time… I already miss the FIFA World Cup and it’s only been 2 months. Godspeed, Washington DC-ites.

October 1st brought another change to the program as well. The maximum weekly benefit has been modified. Typically, the maximum weekly benefit is updated on October 1st of each year, but usually the maximum benefit increases. Instead, the program’s maximum benefit is decreasing from $1,190 to $1,100. This new maximum weekly benefit is only guaranteed to be in effect for one year; it will be updated again next October 1st.

Employers should post the updated mandatory Notice to Employees.

NOTE (for those of you still following along): The legislation was passed on an emergency basis, took effect on August 13, 2026, and expires on November 11, 2026. Permanent legislation with identical provisions is undergoing congressional review and is expected to take effect on November 20, 2026.

ILLINOIS

Paid Leave for Jury Duty

The jury is out on this new leave requirement. Effective 1/1/2027, Illinois is enacting a law that requires employers with 26 or more Illinois-based employees to provide paid leave to those employees when summoned to jury duty.

The state of Illinois has also confirmed that they chose the number 26 as their employee count threshold because it “rolls off the tongue” way better than the number 25 does. State officials specifically described 26 as just having a certain “pizzazz” that 25 severely lacks. Okay, we’re kidding – but what if?

Illinois employees are eligible for paid leave at their regular rate of pay when they attend jury service in any Illinois court. An employee who is summoned to jury duty but is then disqualified from participating is not eligible for the benefit. The leave is job-protected meaning that an employee’s job status cannot be negatively impacted by them using the benefit. Discharging, intimidating, or coercing employees due to their use of jury duty leave is strictly prohibited.

Prior to 1/1/2027, eligible Illinois employees are only entitled to unpaid job protected leave when performing jury service. This leave requirement also applies to employers who have 26 or more Illinois employees.

Menopause Equity and Care Act

Illinois has been going buck-wild this past year by enacting numerous laws that protect employees needing leave or accommodation. The state would be a shoo-in for a leave and accommodation Oscar this year for Most Leave Protections Added, if that existed. I’m officially casting my vote for the creation of an annual leave and accommodation award ceremony. In the tragic absence (pun intended) of an award show, I will be acting out how I would’ve presented Illinois’ award this year.

“Good job, Illinois! You did it. Here’s your award.”

And then I would give the state a fist-bump after that. I clearly have a lot to say as you can tell.

Anyway, enough daydreaming, the newest Illinois employee protection on the docket is the Illinois Menopause Equity and Care Act. Effective 1/1/2027, menopause-related conditions will be protected under the state’s anti-discrimination laws. The new Act amends the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA) to disallow employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of “menopause-related conditions.” The law defines those conditions as “perimenopause, menopause, and associated medical symptomatic conditions.” Conditions such as vasomotor symptoms, sleep disruption, cognitive changes, mood changes, and osteoporosis-related changes are listed as covered.

Employers must also provide reasonable accommodations to their employees for symptoms related to menopause-related conditions. The level of accommodation an employer is required to give an employee has been expanded with this Act. Flexible scheduling, modified work hours, and climate-adjusted workplaces are examples of ways that employers may have to accommodate an employee with pregnancy and menopause conditions.

The new Act comes with new notice requirements for employers. Workplace postings and employee policies must display the employee’s rights to accommodations for menopause-related conditions and pregnancy.

Sadly, this article is coming to end, however, endings are often beginnings for something new. For example, I am now beginning to brainstorm what the leave and accommodation award trophy design will look like.

Volunteer Emergency Workers

Emergency workers are always protecting us so it’s nice to see that the state of Illinois is passing legislation to help protect them.

Illinois signed the Volunteer Worker Job Protection Act into law back in August. Effective 1/1/2027, employers are prohibited from penalizing or discharging Illinois employees who are absent or tardy to work due to activities related to being a volunteer emergency worker.

The volunteer emergency worker activities include:

  • Training for being a volunteer emergency worker
  • Because they responded to an emergency

Additionally, employers cannot require employees to use compensatory time such as PTO or vacation when responding to emergencies or attending training.

In other news, my cat just hurled itself onto my hanging mirror causing it to crash down onto the floor and shatter into 100 pieces. This new Illinois protection will be firmly on my mind while I volunteer my time to sort out this emergency.

LOUISIANA

Voluntary Paid Family Leave Insurance Policies

Louisiana has officially entered the Paid Family & Medical Leave (PFML) game… kind of. Instead of the mandatory PFML that 15 other states have enacted across the country, Louisiana is permitting employers to offer voluntary Paid Family Leave (PFL) to their employees. So, they’ve entered the PFML game in the way your gregarious friend who is passively interested in board games joins a Catan game night. You can tell they attended to socialize rather than actually play—which is great, the more the merrier—but there isn’t a complete commitment to the game. The whole night they’re constantly reminded to play their turn because they’re distracted. It’s been 2 hours and you’ve thought to yourself roughly 32 times, “Stop flirting with Stephanie and roll the dice, Mark!”

Mark’s a good guy though and we appreciate his effort towards the friend-group. We hope it works out with Stephanie too.

Effective 6/8/2026, Louisiana is allowing employers to offer voluntary PFL benefits to their employees that work in the state. The benefit is available to employers as an insurance policy that is purchased from and administered by insurance carriers. A voluntary PFL line of coverage to Louisiana employees must provide a minimum level of benefits to employees.

Louisiana voluntary PFL policies must provide employees with at least two weeks of leave per year for the following reasons:

  • To bond with a child during the first twelve months after the child’s birth or place of adoption or foster care
  • For a family member’s active duty or impending call to active duty in the armed forces
  • To care for a family member with a serious health condition
  • To address a qualifying military exigency as defined under the Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
  • To care for a family member who is a service member injured during military service

PFL policies are required to disclose the amount of benefits paid, the definition of income used to calculate benefits, the method used to determine an employee’s income for purposes of benefit calculation, and any offsets for other income the employee receives. An unpaid waiting period is permitted to be included in a policy plan design if the calculation method for the waiting period is described.

Eligibility limitations are permitted on a policy. An example situation of an eligibility limitation is disallowing employees to use PFL benefits if they are also eligible for workers’ compensation benefits. All limitations must be outlined in the employer’s policy.

MARYLAND

Employer Registration is Live

Since September 1st, there have been reports on the North American continent of strange occurrences. Buildings suddenly tremoring, strange odors wafting in the air, electronic signal interference. Some have sighted a dense bioluminescent fog coalescing at the first hour of each day flowing towards the state of Maryland. You may have experienced some of these things yourself. Don’t worry – we know the answer and it’s not something scary like an earthquake, a gas leak, or hallucinogenic material getting into the water supply.

It’s the Maryland FAMLI Division concocting and beginning to roll out the FAMLI program from their headquarters in Maryland. Crazy, right? Those FAMLI program employees are using their immense powers to brew up the most efficient program possible. All that power can produce some minor and harmless environmental phenomena. On September 1st, an important milestone occurred for the program causing a surge of power so intense that it is leaking from their headquarters and spreading across the continent.

Well, what could possibly have happened to make this power surge happen?

On September 1, 2026, employer registration for Maryland’s upcoming FAMLI program went live. All employers that have at least one employee working in the state of Maryland are required to register with the FAMLI Division. No Maryland employers are exempt from registration except for self-employed individuals who are not automatically eligible but can opt-in to the program. The FAMLI account an employer creates will be where they perform tasks such as submitting quarterly wage and hour reports, making quarterly contribution payments, and if opting for a private plan, filing a Declaration of Intent (DOI) as well as a private plan application.

FAMLI’s first quarterly reporting and contribution collection period is from January 1 to March 31, 2027, with reporting and contributions being available for submission from April 1 to April 30, 2027. It’s crucial that Maryland employers register their account as soon as they can to ensure they are prepared to submit the required wage and hour reporting and, if their benefits are administered by the state, any contributions owed in April.

We’ve highlighted a few important extra tidbits to noodle on when registering your employer’s FAMLI account:

  • An Authorized Officer (a person who is legally permitted to act in an official capacity on behalf of an employer) must register their employer for FAMLI.
  • Once the Authorized Officer creates a Login.gov account, they can register the employer and invite other team members (such as HR employees) to help manage their FAMLI account
    • Additional information required on employer registration: The Authorized Officer must provide information for the employer’s Resident Agent, a person or business designated to receive official legal documents on behalf of the employer.
  • If an employer is using a payroll vendor, and the payroll vendor is willing, the vendor can assist the employer with FAMLI tasks such as submitting wage/hour reports and remitting contributions. To do this, the TPA can send the employer a Power of Attorney for signature; once signed, the employer will be listed as an Active Client in the TPA’s FAMLI account.
    • Important: TPAs are not allowed to register an employer for FAMLI.
  • Only one EIN per registration. If an employer has multiple EINs, each EIN must be registered separately. If subagencies or divisions of an employer have the same EIN, they will be registered together under that single EIN.

Find further instructions on registering your employer for the program on the FAMLI website linked here.

Proof of Consultation Form (for Private Plan)

Employers who have decided to go with a private plan can submit a Declaration of Intent (DOI) in their FAMLI account between 9/1/2026 and 11/15/2026 to exempt themselves from remitting program contributions to the state during the pre-funding period of 1/1/2027 to 12/31/2027. Despite being exempt from remitting contributions to the state, an employer must still collect contributions and hold them in escrow.

An approved DOI does not mean an employer is approved for a private plan. To be approved for a private plan, employers must apply with their policy from an insurance carrier approved by the Division in summer 2027. Currently, insurance carriers are offering illustrative quoting for Maryland FAMLI private plan policies. Submitting a DOI only exempts an employer from remitting contributions to the state from 1/1/2027 to 12/31/2027.

The DOI process requires an employer to provide the Division with a Proof of Private Plan Consulting Form. This form acts as an attestation that an employer has met with an insurance agent licensed in Maryland to discuss the rules surrounding a DOI. The form includes a list of 15 topics curated by the Division that the insurance agent must cover. The intent of this form is to ensure employers understand items such as their FAMLI obligations when submitting a DOI, consequences for terminating their approved DOI before benefits go-live, consequences of having an approved DOI and terminating an approved private plan within the first two years of benefits, and what will happen if a DOI is approved but then their private plan application is denied. Once the discussion has occurred, the employer and insurance agent must sign the attestation before the employer submits it to the Division.

Review the linked Proof of Private Plan Consultation Form for a full list of the required discussion topics.

MINNESOTA

Paid Sick and Safe Time Rules

Minnesota employers received some welcome clarification this summer as the Department of Labor and Industry finalized rules implementing the state’s Earned Sick and Safe Time (ESST) law. While the law itself hasn’t changed, the new guidance helps answer many of the questions employers have been navigating since the program took effect.

We’ve summarized some of the key provisions below:

  • Leave Use Can Be a Factor in Incentive Programs: Under Minnesota’s statute, “it shall be unlawful for an employer’s absence control policy or attendance point system to count earned sick and safe time taken as an absence that may lead to or result in retaliation or any other adverse action.” However, the rules distinguish “negative” from “positive” programs by stating, “if a bonus, reward, or other incentive is based on the achievement of a specified goal such as hours worked, products sold, or perfect attendance and the employee has not met that goal to use of earned sick and safe time, then the incentive may be denied, unless otherwise paid to employees on any other leave status.”
  • Documentation Requests & Responses: Employers can require employees to supply reasonable documentation to support an absence of three or more consecutive scheduled workdays. Notably, the rules create an exception that allows employers to seek documentation earlier if there is a pattern or clear instance of suspected misuse.
  • Designating & Changing a Year: The statute defines a “year” as a regular and consecutive 12-month period determined by an employer that is clearly communicated to each employee. Under the rules, if an employer does not designate and communicate its year, the year will be a calendar year.
  • When Accrual Is Calculated, How Leave Accrues & Advances on Accrual: All similar US sick leave laws talk about the rate of accrual, but few discuss when the accrual calculation must occur. Minnesota’s rules address this issue and require that leave accrued based on hours worked during a pay period must be credited (considered “accrued”) no later than the payday for that pay period. Additionally, the rules clarify that leave accrues in whole-hour units rather than fractionally.
  • Using Leave During Indeterminate-Length Shifts: Some employees work shifts without defined start and stop times. If an employee is scheduled, but needs to use leave, for such a shift, the rules give employers three different options for how to determine how many leave hours the employee will use: 1) hours worked by a replacement worker; 2) hours worked by the employee in the most recent similar shift; or 3) the most hours a similarly situated employee was scheduled to work for such a shift.

Think of these regulations less as a rewrite of the rulebook and more as the state finally adding the missing instruction manual. Minnesota employers should take the opportunity to review their leave policies, attendance programs, and administrative practices to ensure they align with the latest guidance.

Premium Rate Unchanged for 2027

In a bit of rare compliance news that doesn’t require employers to recalibrate their budgets, Minnesota announced that the state Paid Leave premium rate will remain unchanged at 0.88% of covered wages for 2027.

The decision follows the program’s first year of operation, during which more than 75,000 Minnesotans utilized Paid Leave benefits. According to the state, premium collections have generally kept pace with benefit payments, and actuarial projections indicate the program remains financially sustainable at the current rate.

For employers participating in the Minnesota state plan, the announcement provides some welcome predictability heading into 2027. Employers may continue to share premium costs with employees, with employee contributions capped at 0.44% of covered wages, while certain smaller employers may qualify for reduced employer contribution requirements.

While leave programs across the country continue to evolve through legislative and regulatory changes, Minnesota’s decision to maintain the current premium rate offers state plan employers a relatively stable outlook for the coming year. In the world of leave compliance, we’ll take a little certainty whenever we can get it.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Civil Air Patrol Leave

South Carolina employees that are part of the Civil Air Patrol are going to be soaring with glee after reading the news we have for them.  They may also feel like they’re flying over the moon with elation or on cloud nine with excitement.

I know I’d be on top of the world if I were them. Jeez, my spirits are flying high just thinking about the new leave benefits they are entitled to.

Effective 10/1/2026, employers must provide South Carolina employees with leave for qualifying Civil Air Patrol activities. If you didn’t already know, the Civil Air Patrol is a civilian branch of the U.S. Air Force.

At the beginning of each calendar year, employers must offer a fresh bank of leave that a qualifying employee can use for Civil Air Patrol purposes. Eligible employees are entitled to:

  • 30 days of leave annually to respond to Civil Air Patrol emergency operations,
  • 10 days of leave annually to participate in Civil Air Patrol training and proficiency activities

Employers may allow employees to use up to 5 days from one Civil Air Patrol leave reason to supplement the other leave reason. For example, an employer can permit an employee to use 5 days of their training activity leave for emergency operations if they have exhausted the 30 days of that leave reason’s entitlement. Unused leave does not carry over to the next year.

Qualifying emergency operations for leave can occur in the state of South Carolina or in other states and units outside the employee’s typical command pending approval from the employee’s commander and employer.

The law permits employers to deny Civil Air Patrol leave requests from eligible employees if the employers deem them as essential personnel. Additionally, employers are not required to provide Civil Air Patrol leave if the employee is also responding to the same or a concurrent emergency operation as a first responder or other emergency services personnel.

Employers have the option to provide paid or unpaid Civil Air Patrol leave. In the scenario where an employer provides paid Civil Air Patrol leave, they are not required to pay out any unused leave benefits upon separation from employment.

Employees have notice obligations to their employer regarding their Civil Air Patrol status. Within 30 days of hire, employees must notify their employer of Civil Air Patrol membership. Employees must provide their employer notice of their Civil Air Patrol active status within 30 days of October 1, 2026, if they are a member as of that date.

When using Civil Air Patrol Leave for emergency operations, employees are required to provide:

  • Notice that their emergency service participation has ended within 8 hours after it has ceased or at the start of their next workday, whichever is later.
  • Period updates on their anticipated absence length and return-to-work date

In the instance an employee takes training-related leave, employers can require:

  • A minimum of two weeks’ notice before the absence occurs
  • The expected return-to-work date
  • Documentation proving their training has been approved by the employee’s higher authority
  • Evidence of participation from the training provider

In the instance an employee takes emergency operation-related leave, employers can require:

  • As much advanced notice as practicable prior to the absence
  • Documentation proving their training has been approved by the employee’s higher authority including the employee’s commander
  • Evidence of participation from the organization

Employees cannot be required to use or exhaust other leave types such as employer PTO prior to accessing Civil Air Patrol leave. All employment-related benefits and rights must be maintained while an employee is on leave. The employee must be reinstated to their former or an equivalent position that has the same pay, status, and benefits. Employers are prohibited from taking adverse action against employees for using Civil Air Patrol leave.

WASHINGTON

Washington Paid Family and Medical Leave Premium Rate Increasing Jan. 1, 2027

Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) premium rate will increase effective Jan. 1, 2027. The new total premium rate will be 1.2% of each employee’s gross wages, up from 1.13% in 2026. The statutory maximum WA PFML premium rate is 1.2% of covered wages, meaning it has reached the current statutory cap.

For 2027, the premium will be divided as follows:

  • Employees: 70.7% of the total premium
  • Employers: 29.3% of the total premium

Employers classified by the Washington Employment Security Department as having fewer than 50 employees for the 2027 calendar year are not required to pay the employer portion. They must, however, continue to collect the employee portion or pay it on employees’ behalf.

Beginning Jan. 1, 2027, employers should:

  • Update payroll systems to apply the 1.2% premium rate to wages paid on or after Jan. 1.
  • Withhold premiums from employees’ gross wages, excluding tips, up to the Social Security wage cap. The 2027 Social Security wage cap is $192,300.

Employers should ensure payroll updates are completed timely, as premiums cannot be retroactively withheld from employees.

The state will continue updating employer guides, the 2027 mandatory workplace poster and paystub insert through the end of the year. Employers can monitor updates through Washington Paid Leave employer updates.

Washington Healthy Starts Act – Lactation Accommodation

Effective January 1, 2027, amendments made to the Washington Healthy Starts will require lactation/pumping breaks to be paid. Employers should be aware of the following rule changes:

  • Lactation/pumping break time must be paid. Employees must be paid their regular compensation rate for reasonable break time used to express breast milk.
  • Required travel time must also be paid. If an employee must travel to an employer-designated location to express milk, that travel time must be compensated.
  • Employees cannot be required to use PTO or other paid leave for lactation break time.
  • Lactation breaks are in addition to meal and rest periods and should not be treated as or substituted for required meal or rest breaks.
  • The law also expands coverage to all Washington employers, rather than applying only to employers meeting the prior employee-count threshold.
  • The lactation accommodation generally applies for two years following the child’s birth.

Employers with Washington employees should review and update their policies, timekeeping practices, and manager guidance before January 1, 2027. In particular, employers should ensure that employees are not being instructed to clock out, use PTO, or otherwise treat required lactation breaks as unpaid time.

Washington PFML Adopts Employer-Focused Administrative Changes

The Washington Employment Security Department (ESD) has adopted several amendments to Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) regulations that primarily affect employer premium reporting, penalty administration, payment plans, and job restoration requirements. The changes took effect October 2, 2026.

  • New Penalty Waiver Process for Employers: ESD created a new rule establishing a formal process for employers to request waiver of PFML penalties. This provides employers with a clearer path for seeking relief when penalties are assessed.
  • Payment Plans Available for Delinquent Premiums: Employers may now request payment plans for outstanding PFML premiums. ESD emphasized that employers generally will not need to demonstrate “good cause” to be considered for a payment plan.
  • Additional Opportunity to Avoid Reporting Penalties: ESD amended its reporting rules to add an extra step before a warning letter is issued for late employer reports. The agency stated the change is intended to give employers acting in good faith additional opportunities to correct reporting issues before the formal penalty process begins.
  • Interest on Late Premiums Reduced: Delinquent PFML premiums will now accrue simple instead of compound interest, potentially lowering employers’ late-payment costs.

Clarification to Job Restoration Eligibility: ESD clarified a key provision stemming from HB 1213. While the law reduced the PFML job restoration service requirement from one year to 180 days, the amended rule specifies that those 180 days must be completed following the employee’s most recent hire date. Prior periods of employment cannot be counted toward the requirement. This clarification may be particularly important for employers with rehired employees.

HAVE QUESTIONS FOR OUR TOTAL ABSENCE MANAGEMENT TEAM?

CHECK OUT OUR BLOG

Image for TPG Announces Partnership with Mustard Seed Financial & Insurance
Image for When Innovation Is Everywhere, Experience Matters More
Image for The Risk of Managing Today’s Business with Yesterday’s Assumptions