Sure, the holidays are over, but leave is the gift that keeps on giving. The DOL and the IRS are still feeling generous because they gave us two FMLA opinion letters and time-sensitive tax guidance impacting statutory PFML programs. Beyond that, we have new notice posters, fresh details on Maryland’s delayed-but-not-defeated PFML program, rule clarifications affecting multiple statutory PFML programs, and plenty more to unwrap. Oh, and let’s not forget Minnesota and Delaware are officially giving the gift of PFML benefits to eligible workers as of January 1st. Who said we couldn’t have Christmas in January?

Leave don’t cost a thing when you use this newsletter to stay compliant; consider it our gift to you. What does carry a cost is the prospect of a lawsuit for failing to keep up with the many changes in the leave compliance space.

FEDERAL UPDATES

2026_01_TAM_Q1_Newsletter_OpinionLetter_372x300

Two New Department of Labor (DOL) Opinion Letters on FMLA

Guess what, my HR friends? The DOL is listening because two different HR questions triggered two formal FMLA opinion letters in early January. Use this as motivation to make all your wildest dreams come true and request an opinion letter on those burning FMLA questions.

First up, this letter: if an employee has approved intermittent FMLA for medical appointments, does the Act also protect travel time to and from those appointments?

YEP.

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) explained that FMLA is not limited to the minutes an employee spends in an exam room. When an employee needs treatment for a serious health condition, obtaining that treatment includes getting to and from the health care provider. As a result, employees may use FMLA leave for the appointment itself and for reasonable travel time connected to that appointment.

WHD also addressed a common administrative sticking point: medical certifications often confirm the need for periodic appointments but say nothing about travel. According to the letter, that omission does not make the certification incomplete or insufficient. Employers may not deny or limit FMLA leave simply because the health care provider did not estimate commute time.

At the same time, the letter draws clear operational boundaries. FMLA leave for travel time must be tied to the medical visit. It does not cover unrelated errands (no Starbucks drive-thru), extended detours, or additional time not reasonably connected to obtaining care. In short, travel counts, but only travel that actually serves the medical purpose.

Second, this letter addresses a common problem for school employers: how to calculate FMLA leave when a school closes for less than a full workweek due to weather or other disruptions. Pause, please reflect with me briefly: the opinion letter is specific to schools, but it is our highly sophisticated and expert opinion (legal disclaimer: we are not attorneys). This letter has broader implications and could apply to any business affected by a partial week closure (i.e., weather, fire, tornado, rampant rodents, etc.).

WHD grounded its analysis in a basic principle – FMLA leave is measured in workweeks, and employees may not be charged for leave they did not actually take. From there, the outcome depends on how the employee is using FMLA leave – intermittently or continuously.

If an employee is approved for intermittent or reduced schedule FMLA leave, only the time the employee would otherwise have been required to work counts against the entitlement. When the school (or other business type) closes for a day or two, and the employee is not expected to report to work, those closure days do not reduce available FMLA leave (if the employee would need intermittent time on one of those days).

However, when an employee is on FMLA leave for the entire workweek (continuously), the full week counts as FMLA even if the school closes mid-week. In that scenario, the closure does not pause the leave, credit time back, or change the weekly calculation. This is conceptually the same way FMLA is calculated for holidays – when a holiday falls during a week in which an employee is taking FMLA for the whole week, the entire week is counted as FMLA.

The letter also makes clear what does not matter: whether the closure was planned or unplanned, whether the school (or other business) later scheduled make-up days, or why the closure occurred. None of those variables affect how much FMLA leave is used. What matters is the structure of the approved leave and whether the employee was scheduled to work.

What should we take away from this other than the feeling of giddiness from a new Opinion Letter? First, FMLA leave can include reasonable travel time to medical appointments, even if the cert does not include commute estimates. Second, partial week closures do not expand or shrink FMLA entitlements for those on continuous leaves, but for employees on intermittent or reduced schedule leave, charge only the time the employee would have worked and actually missed – nothing more.

2026_01_TAM_Q1_Newsletter_Taxes_372x300

PFML Tax Withholding

In late December, the IRS issued new guidance granting all states that administer paid family and medical leave programs a one-year extension to implement updated federal tax withholding and reporting requirements for paid medical leave benefits. This extension is formally outlined in IRS Notice 2026-6 and delays the effective date of these federal tax changes until 2027.

What this means for 2026, if you utilize a state plan, is that PFML will continue to operate under its current federal tax framework, with no changes to your obligations. Specifically,

  • Medical leave benefits will not be treated as “third-party sick pay” for federal tax purposes, do not need to be reported on an employee’s W-2, and will continue to be administered consistent with the program’s existing benefit treatment. Only the portion of Medical Leave benefits that is attributable to an employer is considered income. Keep in mind, employer pick-up amounts (voluntary employer payment of EE’s share of PFML contributions) are taxable wages for 2026 and must be reported as such.
  • 100% of Family Leave benefits are considered income.
  • Employers will not have any new federal withholding or reporting responsibilities related to PFML benefits in 2026.
  • There will be no change to employer FICA tax obligations associated with medical leave benefits.
  • Employees can still voluntarily elect federal income tax withholding, regardless of the type of benefit they receive.

In short, employers should expect no operational or payroll changes related to PFML federal tax treatment for the upcoming year. If you utilize a private plan, it’s key to check in with your carrier partner to see how this update may impact their handling of benefits/taxation under a private plan.

CASE LAW

2026_01_TAM_Q1_Newsletter_CaseLaw_372x300

No Exceptions? Not the Most Advisable Course of Action

According to a recent press release from the EEOC, a job applicant for a laborer role was unlawfully questioned about using methadone as part of medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction and then not hired because of his answer.  A human-resources representative allegedly confirmed the same.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, when the job applicant applied and interviewed for the position, the hiring manager asked him what medications he was currently taking (ABORT!). When the applicant revealed methadone, the hiring manager told the applicant they would not be hired due to a longstanding company policy prohibiting the employment of workers who take methadone. The EEOC also claims a broader class of applicants was affected by this rule, which allegedly excluded individuals using methadone, Suboxone, or similar Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT).

The lawsuit asserts ADA violations tied to the denial of hire, unlawful qualification standards, prohibited pre-offer inquiries, and the use of information obtained through those inquiries.

For additional context, it’s not uncommon for our practice to receive questions about prescription drug use (usually prescribed opioids) and the ability to deny an employee’s return to work (or, in this case, employment). Let’s look at how courts and a recent federal decision frame these issues.

A federal decision involving similar allegations from 2022 provides helpful context for understanding how methadone and MAT fit into the ADA framework.

First, the decision reiterates that methadone taken under medical supervision is not “illegal drug use” under the ADA. The statute excludes lawful, supervised use from the definition of illegal drug activity, and courts applying the ADA consistently recognize this distinction.

Second, blanket rules disqualifying applicants who use methadone can violate the ADA. The court explained that applicants cannot be rejected solely because of prescribed methadone use without an individualized assessment tied to actual job requirements and safety considerations.

Third, the court noted that rescinding a job offer because of prescribed methadone use may support a “regarded as” disability claim. Courts evaluating similar scenarios have found these actions to reflect assumptions about impairment rather than individualized, objective evaluation.

Ultimately, the EEOC has stressed that employers may not impose barriers that screen out applicants in recovery from opioid addiction — including those lawfully using methadone or other MAT medications. Automatic exclusions are red flags.

Next up…. the EEOC (and me personally) views pre-offer questions such as “hey, what medication do you currently take” likely to elicit disability information as a serious violation. These questions will also likely elicit a serious lawsuit. All applicants, with or without disabilities, are entitled to a hiring process free from those inquiries until a conditional offer is made.

Employers should evaluate actual, objective risks — not generalized assumptions about addiction or MAT medications. Safety concerns must be supported by individualized medical information obtained at the correct stage of the process.

Withdrawing an offer based on lawful MAT use or prohibiting an employee from returning to work due to perceived concerns about legally prescribed drugs when medically cleared — particularly without individualized assessment or in disregard of clear ADA rules could lead to claims the EEOC is prepared to pursue.

STATE UPDATES

CALIFORNIA

The California Department of Labor recently released a revised Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act (HWHFA) poster reflecting recent amendments to the state paid sick leave law. California employers should promptly update their workplace postings.

COLORADO

Strap in, folks, because the Colorado legislature was busy in late 2025 brewing up some potent changes to their FAMLI program. Effective 1/1/2026 – revisions, clarifications, and more revisions have stirred up the FAMLI regulatory pot. We’ve broken out the significant updates below and hope you find them helpful!

Colorado FAMLI New Program Notice

The FAMLI Division released an updated notice informing employees of their rights under the program. The new notice has information about the 2026 contribution rate and the ability for employees to take neonatal care leave. To remain in compliance, it’s important to update the current displayed notice with the new one. Additionally, employers must provide the updated program notice within 5 days of the following situations:

  • Upon hiring
  • When an employee transfers to a Colorado location from another state
  • Upon learning that a covered individual has experienced or is experiencing a triggering event under the program
  • Upon receiving an employee leave request that qualifies under a protected family and medical leave program, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

You can find the updated program notice here.

Clarification on Benefit Supplementation & Administrator Benefit Payments

Colorado has revised the FAMLI rules to clarify that employers may now require employees to exhaust their FAMLI leave entitlement before using non-statutory, company-provided leave or other disability benefits. Before you throw confetti up in celebration like it’s a Y2K New Year’s party, the regulations clarified that employers cannot require employees to use FAMLI leave before accessing statutory benefits such as FMLA or Colorado paid sick leave.

Employers and employees can mutually agree to supplement an employee’s FAMLI benefit with payments through a disability program or other employer-provided paid leave up to 100% of their usual wage. However, employers are still prohibited from conditioning access to FAMLI leave on first exhausting employer-provided disability or other paid leave benefits. It’s important to note that non-compliance with these rules constitutes interference with an employee’s FAMLI rights.

Lumped in with this supplementation update is an important little detail on benefit payments for employers changing FAMLI plan administrators. An administrator who began paying benefits on a claim prior to an employer’s plan effective date with a new administrator must service the claim until the completion of the approved leave. An example of where this would be applicable is when an employer changes private plan carriers. Additionally, the original plan administrator is responsible for any claims that were submitted retroactively for a leave date that is within the timeframe of the original plan. The original administrator is not responsible for any claims with a leave start date after their plan expires.

Have you ever gotten a pet with your significant other, broken up, and then had to co-parent the pet with them? Yeah, this kind of sounds like the PFML version of that. Awkward stuff.

Appeals Term Definitions

The option to appeal things is appealing. I wish we could all appeal to more things. Darn it. If only a governmental entity put out extensive guidelines on how to appeal something new.

Wait, what? I’m just now stumbling upon an announcement that Colorado has clarified their appeals process for employers and employees to challenge FAMLI claim decisions. This is exactly what we needed. Thanks, Colorado!

Under the current Colorado FAMLI rules, a party negatively affected by a FAMLI claim determination can appeal the decision to the Appeals Unit. A hearing officer with the Appeals Unit would oversee the appeal. You may be wondering what the definitions of “party,” “determination,” and “hearing officer” are in this context. Me too! An officer’s hearing must be impressive to get the name of the hearing officer.

The updated revisions clarify that “determination” is an administrative decision made by the state or a private plan that:

  • explicitly or effectively approves or denies all or part of an FAMLI claim;
  • imposes fines, fees, penalties, or any other monetary liability;
  • identifies an overpayment or requires repayment of benefits;
  • awards damages or other remedies;
  • denies or grants all or part of the relief requested in an accepted grievance, investigation, or complaint; or
  • withdraws the approval of a private plan or finds that a private plan committed a violation of the FAMLI Act or its implementation regulations.
  • change the status of a premium account
  • deny a request to waive an overpayment
  • assess premiums

This list only comprises some examples of the term and is not reflective of every possible instance of a “determination.” The rules also made clear that a Division notice only informing a claimant of an incomplete application or requesting additional information is not considered a “determination.”

The term “party” is defined as any person identified as a party in the rules or with a legally cognizable interest in the appeal’s outcome. Multiple people can be considered a “party” regarding an appeal. The Division and private plan administrators are also a “party.”

A “hearing officer” is an administrative judge within the Appeals Unit.

General Appeal Process Changes

FAMLI is expanding its options to file appeals. Documents for the appeals process can now be sent via an Appeals Unit-approved electronic filing system. Additionally, the Appeals Unit will accept an electronic attestation as a form of signature for filing an appeal.

The revised rules state that the burden of proof is “by a preponderance of evidence.” This means that the aggrieved party must prove that there is a more than 50% chance that what they are claiming is true.

Neonatal Care Amendments

Effective 1/1/2026, Colorado has a new reason that eligible employees can use FAMLI for: neonatal care leave. An employee may receive up to 12 additional weeks of FAMLI leave if their infant is receiving treatment in a neonatal intensive care unit.

New amendments further detail an employee’s ability to use leave for this reason:

  • Leave is available to a child’s parents or anyone standing in loco parentis
  • Neonatal care leave is distinct from FAMLI leave to care for a new child
  • Taking neonatal care leave does not affect an employee’s ability to take other types of FAMLI leave
  • Leave may be taken intermittently

Private Plan Rule Amendments

A slew of changes to Colorado FAMLI private plan rules were a part of the 1/1/2026 regulatory amendments. See a list of the key updates below:

  • Benefit Payments: Private plans must issue wage replacement benefits within two weeks of a claim being filed and continue payments every two weeks thereafter. A claimant may appeal the plan’s failure to issue payments within two weeks after the claim is filed.
  • Information Sharing: Private plan administrators may now share information needed for an employer to comply with federal or state tax laws.
  • Appeals: All private plan determinations are appealable directly to the Division. Claimants cannot be required to complete internal carrier reviews before appealing.
  • Plan Approval Timing: Approved private plans may take effect no earlier than 60 days after the Division receives a complete application.
  • Renewals and Reporting: The annual attestation requirement is not present in the new private plan renewal rules. Additionally, the ability for an employer to switch from quarterly to annual reporting after three years of an approved private plan is now tied to the employer’s timeliness in submitting reporting.

General FAMLI Amendments

The Colorado Department of Labor has been hard at work making modifications to the FAMLI program to be the best it can be for employers and employees. Clearly, that’s why there are so many changes effective 1/1/2026. So many, in fact, that we dedicated a whole section to random bits of important amendment information that may be too small to dedicate a whole article to. Below you can find a list of these sweet little nuggets of Coloradoan wisdom:

  • Employers and Employees may challenge the Colorado Department of Labor’s premium assessment. They must first make a request within 49 days after the premium’s due date. The deadline may be extended an additional 49 days in certain situations.
  • For calculating an employer’s size to assess their premium responsibilities, the criteria to consider someone “employed” are if they performed any work during a workweek or were on any type of paid or unpaid leave. The amendments now specify that being on protected military leave qualifies an employee to be considered “employed.”
  • The Department of Labor must notify an employer if it changes the employer’s size. The size change would be effective on the date the additional premiums reflecting the size change are due.
  • An employee on intermittent or reduced schedule FAMLI leave for neonatal care will not have their benefits stopped if they terminate employment or switch employers.
  • Leave taken on a reduced schedule requires a static and defined leave schedule

Update 2026 Employee Headcount

All employers with Colorado employees must update their Annual Total Employee Headcount for 2026 in My FAMLI+ Employer, including employers with approved private plans. There is a reminder in your portal messaging center with instructions to help complete this task.

If no update is submitted by February 28, 2026, employers will pay the full 2026 premium rate (.88%) for all employees. Please note the details below:

  • Opted-out local governments are the only exception.
  • Headcount is not carried over from the prior year.
  • Headcount includes all payroll employees nationwide who worked 20 or more calendar workweeks in 2025, regardless of full-time or part-time status.

Payroll/Leave Ops Teams: Submit the 2026 Annual Total Employee Headcount in My FAMLI+ Employer by February 28, 2026.

DELAWARE

On December 1, 2025, Delaware published last-minute amendments to their Paid Family & Medical Leave program that went live on 1/1/2026. The change most prominent to employers is the program’s required leave year calculation method, or “application year,” that is used to measure an employee’s Delaware PFML benefit entitlement. Delaware has announced that the program will now be tracked on a rolling forward 12-month period, meaning an employee’s 12-month period is measured from the first day they take leave under Delaware PFML.

Prior to these amendments, Delaware PFML was going to allow employers to choose any of the 12-month period options available under the FMLA: rolling back, rolling forward, calendar year, or a specified fixed 12-month period, such as an employee’s anniversary date. Employers tracking FMLA leave with a different 12-month period than rolling forward may now struggle to coordinate the benefit with Delaware PFML. Employees will often be eligible for both leave entitlements concurrently, and tracking them on disparate 12-month periods can result in:

  • Unneeded complexity for leave administrators
  • Leave stacking
  • A confusing experience for the employee to understand their entitlements

For employers that were not planning to use a rolling forward 12-month period for Delaware PFML, we recommend performing a review of leave policies to do the following:

  • Specify that Delaware PFML is tracked on a rolling forward basis.
  • See if the organization can change the 12-month period used to track other leaves, such as the FMLA, to rolling forward for easier coordination with Delaware PFML. However, be mindful of the 60-day notice requirement to change the calendar method under FMLA. Details can be found here, on Fact Sheet #28H.

MARYLAND

FAMLI Division Details on Tentative Program Rollout

Maryland’s PFML program is coming soon! It’s had a long road from inception to final implementation, but we’re almost there. To give context as to how long we’ve been waiting for the program, we’ve put together a historically accurate timeline for you:

The Big Bang spread space dust throughout the Cosmos. Space rock clumped together to form Earth in the Milky Way. Dinosaurs roamed Earth. The State of Maryland introduced its PFML program. Humans evolved. Maryland delayed its PFML program. Human agricultural society developed. Maryland delayed its PFML program again. The Industrial Revolution rapidly advanced human society. Maryland delayed its PFML program once more.

Yep, that’s the actual timeline of our universe.

In all seriousness, Maryland’s PFML program is set to begin contributions on 1/1/2027 with a benefit go-live date of 1/3/2028. We have some helpful insights into the program’s inner workings and the rollout timeline leading up to its commencement. See the details below!

  • The Department of Labor said it does not plan to introduce any new FAMLI legislation this session and is staying focused on getting the program implemented.
  • The Department hopes to finalize the regulations before the session to give stakeholders clarity and issue guidance based on the final rules, though no firm timeline was shared.
  • The employer registration system will soft launch between March and early May, starting with employers and later bringing in third-party administrators. The goal during this period is to register roughly the first 1,000 employers. Registration will continue through the summer, followed by a full public launch and marketing push in early fall.
  • The Declaration of Intent period will open in mid-fall 2026, and employers will need to upload documentation showing they consulted with a broker before opting into a private plan. Presenting documentation of consulting with a broker is not something we’ve observed with other programs.
  • Contributions will begin in January, with the first contribution submissions due in April for employers that have not filed a Declaration of Intent.
  • Equivalent plan applications (this is separate and additional to the Declaration of Intent) will open first for self-insured plans in summer 2027, with commercial applications opening once plans receive approval.
  • Instead of mandating specific certification forms, the Department plans to provide required fields. The Department confirmed it will accept FMLA forms for applicable claims and expects private plans to do the same to reduce the burden on employees and healthcare providers.
  • On the anchor date, the Department said it is working with the date as written in statute and does not plan to change it this year, but is open to future conversations once implementation is underway. The “anchor date” establishes when an employee is eligible for benefits. “Anchor date” is defined as the earlier date on which an application for benefits is complete or when leave begins for a covered individual.

MINNESOTA

Minnesota Paid Leave is Live!

Benefits and contributions for Minnesota Paid Leave are live as of January 1, 2026. We’re all basking in the glory of paid leave. I can see the confetti, each piece shaped like Minnesota, falling from the sky.

Minnesota employers now have a responsibility to begin remitting contributions to the state and ensuring that eligible employees are directed to the state or a private plan administrator to access job-protected paid leave.

As a reminder, all Minnesota employers must do the following to remain compliant with the program’s requirements:

  1. Register an Employer Account with the state. Employers will submit quarterly wage reports, pay paid leave premiums, and designate a Paid Leave Administrator here.
  2. Designate a Paid Leave Administrator for your organization within your Employer Account.
  3. Create your Paid Leave Administrator Account. The Paid Leave Administrator Account allows your organization to review leave applications, view Paid Leave determinations, access tax filing information, apply for Small Employer Assistance Grants, and request an equivalent plan.

For comprehensive instructions on completing the above steps, click here: https://pl.mn.gov/employers/roles-and-responsibilities

Minnesota Paid Leave Taxable Wage Base

As leave geeks, our team eagerly awaits the announcement of the new social security wage cap each year. This announcement is like our equivalent of New Year’s Day.

We all make t-shirts each year, proudly displaying the new wage cap to commemorate this special day, and wear them to our team meetings.

Obviously, I’m just kidding… maybe.

The new federal social security wage cap for 2026 is $184,500. Typically, state PFML programs will use this number as the maximum taxable wage base for employers when remitting employee contributions to the state. That means employers are not allowed to deduct any percentage of an employee’s wage that exceeds $184,500 in 2026.

Minnesota’s Paid Leave program has adopted a different approach to the taxable wage base. The program is rounding up the Social Security wage cap of $184,500 to $185,000.

Minnesota employers remitting employee contributions cannot deduct more than 0.44% of 0.88% of an employee’s paycheck up to their taxable wage base maximum of $185,000 in 2026.

Just so you know, we will not be making revised t-shirts with $185,000 printed on them.

OREGON

New Paid Leave Oregon Rules

Oregon has finalized Batch 14 rule updates for Paid Leave Oregon (PLO), introducing 16 rule changes that clarify benefit administration, documentation requirements, equivalent plan coordination, and appeals processes. All 41 pages of the Batch 14 Administrative Order are linked here. Below are the key highlights employers should be aware of:

  • Authorized Representatives: New rules clarify who may act on behalf of an incapacitated or deceased claimant, required documentation, expiration of authority, and confirm that only one authorized representative may be recognized at a time.
  • Benefit Year Coordination: Strengthened rules prevent employees from exceeding allowable leave when moving between an equivalent plan and the state plan within a 12-month benefit year, including new reporting requirements for intermittent leave.
  • Definition Updates: Clarifies the definition of in loco parentis and aligns average weekly wage timing with Oregon’s Unemployment Insurance program.
  • Pre-Placement & Pregnancy Leave: Confirms pre-placement leave is limited to 12 weeks per child, and pregnancy-related leave may be taken once per pregnancy.
  • Verification Standards: Expanded and clarified documentation requirements for bonding leave, serious health conditions, and safe leave, including when secondary documentation is required. The purpose of the amendments is to ensure the verification requirements for bonding reflect the full range of legally recognized documents used to establish paternity or guardianship and to clarify how a claimant may show an in loco parentis relationship with a child. With regard to serious health conditions, the rule amendment clarifies that verification documentation must be signed by the patient’s health care provider when the claimant is requesting leave to care for a family member, and updates the required information to include the patient’s date of birth, when it differs from the claimant’s.
  • Employer Notices: Employers (state plan and equivalent plan) must update required workplace posters when revised versions are issued and ensure delivery to remote employees.
  • Equivalent Plan Reporting: Annual aggregate benefit usage reporting requirements are now explicitly defined in the rule and may be submitted by plan administrators.
  • Equivalent Plan Withdrawal: Clarifies termination effective dates based on when notice is submitted relative to quarter-end deadlines.
  • Appeals Process: Makes permanent a temporary rule allowing the department to represent itself in hearings and clarifies representation for incapacitated or deceased claimants.

Rule Repealed

  • Job Protection Rule: PLO job protection rule has been repealed following statutory changes that transfer enforcement authority for job protection, retaliation, and discrimination matters to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI).

Equivalent Plan Annual Claim & Financial Reporting

Paid Leave Oregon equivalent plan employers were required to submit their annual benefit utilization and financial report to the state by January 31, 2026. This reporting includes both claim-level data and information related to employee contributions collected during the reporting period.

If you have not yet submitted your equivalent plan annual report, please contact us as soon as possible so we can assist with gathering the required data and completing the state submission.

UPCOMING EVENTS

2026_01_TAM_Newsletter_Q1_TAM Gif

A DMEC Compliance Conference Summons to St. Louis, Missouri

From April 13th to April 16th, 2026, the Disability Management Employer Coalition (DMEC) is hitting the quaint midwestern streets of St. Louis, Missouri, to host its Compliance Conference. Registration is OPEN for the conference. For all those Lord of the Rings fans out there, this is the equivalent of the Beacons of Gondor being lit to summon all leave of absence and HR professionals for an educational gathering of monumental proportions. I also like to imagine the person who lit those beacons was a saintly person named Louis; it would just be too good.

As always, our Total Absence Management team will be making the trek to the conference. We will be contributing to the discussion with an exhibitor booth and a special presentation hosted by our very own Brycie Wasson, Marissa Hawkins, and Rich D’Albert, inspired by classic television game shows like Jeopardy! and The Price is Right.

We’ll have more details soon on TAM’s presence at the 2026 DMEC Compliance Conference. We hope to see you there!

2025-07_TAM_AMPod_CoverArt_1080x1080px

TAM’s Absence Minded Podcast hosted by Brycie Wasson and Christine Hinnerichs

The Total Absence Management team has a new monthly podcast called Absence Minded, hosted by Christine Hinnerichs and Brycie Wasson, where they put the “mind” in Absence Minded.

Since birth, you might have been wandering through life with the nagging question of where you could find a podcast dedicated to absence management strategies that are expertly researched, articulated, and delivered by hosts who make you feel like an old friend. If that extremely narrow scenario has been the case, and even if it hasn’t, we think you’ll find immense value in the insights Christine and Brycie provide to keep your organization compliant and your employees satisfied.

In a recent episode, the dynamic hosts boldly explore the spooky depths of our world that many aren’t willing to go: best practices for paid parental leave program design, obviously. Every month, a new episode will drop, dedicated to a new absence management topic.

Check out this link to listen to the entire episodic library of the podcast: https://www.thepartnersgroup.com/absence-minded-podcast/

HAVE QUESTIONS FOR OUR TOTAL ABSENCE MANAGEMENT TEAM?

CHECK OUT OUR BLOG

Image for The TPG Difference: Where Benefits Meet Real Talk
Image for Sales Leadership: Building a Culture of Excellence, Trust, and Relationships
Image for Absence Minded – A Fresh Approach to Compliance and Connection